Cosmetic changes aren’t enough. Structural change is needed.
by David K. Williams, Jr. | 11:53 am, August 15, 2010 | 2 Comments
I have heard that the Tea Party movement is against the status quo. Good.The two party system is part of the status quo.
Plurality voting is part of the status quo.
I ask: Is the Tea Party really against the status quo, or does it just want different people in charge of the status quo?
If the latter, the movement is doomed. You can't change the status quo from within the status quo.
Remodeling a house does not change its foundation. A new coat of paint does not fix the rotting beams.
Category:
Colorado Politics, PPC, Syndicated
Tags: structural change > Syndicated > Tea Party Movement
Tags: structural change > Syndicated > Tea Party Movement
Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
In today’s environment it’s hard to find good news. But this is good news: the free market is working, and putting statists’ predictions, like Hubbert’s, to shame. Oh, the joy!
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Printing Money Doesn’t Work in Britain Either
- Oklahoma’s Constitutional Amendment Would Pit Taxpayers Against Unions
- Friday’s Unemployment Numbers: Correcting the Corrections
- Romney Woos Grand Junction, Earns Sen. King’s Endorsement
- The Borking of Netflix: movie service finds privacy law to be an inconvenience





August 15th, 2010 @ 2:58 pm
Are you jumping into that “Second Amendment remedies” nonsense?
August 15th, 2010 @ 3:19 pm
I think he’s just referring to viable third party movements. Of course, the 2A remedy might be necessary at some point, but that does not in the least seem to be the topic of the post.