The Blueprint is Alive and Well
by acmaurerco | 11:41 am, July 29, 2010 | 1 Comment
Enter Democratic 527s with three mailers targeting Dean and the Tea Parties as “too conservative for Colorado.” You can read all about it on Ben DeGrow’s blog . Because they know Dean will be a conservative voice in the Colorado senate, they want to take him out in the primary. That’s how the Blueprint works.
It’s up to us, however, to defeat The Blueprint. Dean has a grassroots team that is working hard to make personal calls to every one of the 22,000 Republican voters in his district. But he needs money as well for radio spots and a mailer. He has the support of Sen Bill Armstrong, and State Sens Kevin Lundberg and Dave Schultheis.
1. Read all about Dean
2. Contribute to his campaign. You can donate up to $400 per person.
3. Spread the word.
Time is short. They’re working hard in District 6 but they need help. Tear up the Blueprint.
Tags: Blueprint > conservative > Dean Boehler > election > Syndicated
Comments
Featured Posts
- Open Thread: Should Dan Maes Withdraw?
(25)
Do you think Dan Maes should step aside as the Republican nominee for governor? Why or why not? If he did step aside, who do you think the vacancy committee should consider in his stead and why?
- Speak Now, or Forever Hold Your Peace… Governor’s Office seeks public comment on Colorado Supreme Court nominees
- R Block Party Second Annual Picnic
(1)
- Happy 2nd Birthday to People’s Press Collective!
(3)
- Statewide Survey Results Show Overwhelming Discontent With Incumbent Colorado Supreme Court Justices
(8)
- “The GOP Made Me Do It”
(9)
- Clear The Bench Colorado wins judgement against “frivolous, groundless, vexatious” complaint by “Colorado Ethics Watch” (CEW, pronounced “sue” – it’s what they do), awarded “tens of thousands” in legal fees
(3)
















July 29th, 2010 @ 5:40 pm
Disturbing. I’m spreading the word.
Note to PPC webmaster: the address “peoplespresscollective.org” produces a near-empty site and doesn’t refer to “www.peoplespresscollective.org”
Some people I’ve talked with visited the first address and left disappointed.