Fox 31: Republican Plan B?
by elpresidente | 12:12 am, July 15, 2010 | 1 Comment
“I hope McInnis can survive this and I think he can. And I still will support his campaign. But, gosh, this was supposed to be a great year for us Republicans — and now we have to deal with this crap”–Tom Tancredo, speaking to Fox 31
Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
In today’s environment it’s hard to find good news. But this is good news: the free market is working, and putting statists’ predictions, like Hubbert’s, to shame. Oh, the joy!
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Printing Money Doesn’t Work in Britain Either
- Oklahoma’s Constitutional Amendment Would Pit Taxpayers Against Unions
- Friday’s Unemployment Numbers: Correcting the Corrections
- Romney Woos Grand Junction, Earns Sen. King’s Endorsement
- The Borking of Netflix: movie service finds privacy law to be an inconvenience
Follow PPC
Search
WayIn
Recent Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Integrating Aerial Photography in Search and Rescue
- Integrating Aerial Photography in Search and Rescue
- A Few Thoughts about Volunteer Search and Rescue
- A Few Thoughts about Volunteer Search and Rescue
- Seeing Stars: Snipers, Fraud and MP3s
- Independence Institute’s 27th Annual Founders Night Dinner Just Around the Corner
- Which Republican Will Crater for Carbon Tax?
- Which Republican will crater for carbon tax?
Recent Comments
- Jeff on Sen. Udall: “Legitimate Argument” to build Keystone Pipeline in “National Interest”; Obama Administration Approved 2009 Pipeline for Economic, Strategic Reasons
- cologeek on Sen. Udall: “Legitimate Argument” to build Keystone Pipeline in “National Interest”; Obama Administration Approved 2009 Pipeline for Economic, Strategic Reasons
- Val on Sen. Udall: “Legitimate Argument” to build Keystone Pipeline in “National Interest”; Obama Administration Approved 2009 Pipeline for Economic, Strategic Reasons
- Steve Dorman on Romney Up in Latest PPP Poll, Santorum In Second; Gingrich Falters
- Chris Maj on Three cheers for data privacy, but is a ‘Right to be Forgotten’ too much?
- PerlStalker on Three cheers for data privacy, but is a ‘Right to be Forgotten’ too much?
- Brent Glenn on Progress Now Colorado 2012 Brand Survey
- Peoples Press Collective | Colorado Politics | You didn’t want your Fifth Amendment rights, anyway, did you? : on In which the Washington Bureau Chief is cryptic
- elpresidente on PPC Trainings Are Back!
- Marla Gillaspie on PPC Trainings Are Back!
When a young girl gets close to the truth about a long-forgotten mystery, a harmless adventure becomes a threat to the future of the independent commercial settlements on Mars. 
Advertise Here!
Categories
Archives
Meta
Buy a Tea Party Poster!
Blogroll
Contributors
- Anthony Surace – PPC
- Backbone Radio
- BlueCarp
- Colorado Peak Politics – ppc
- Colorado Spending Transparency
- ColoradoFreedom.net
- Complete Colorado
- Denver Metro Young Republicans
- Ed is Watching
- Energy Policy Center
- ExPat ExLawyer
- Free Colorado
- GneissGuy
- Government Underground
- Liberty on the Rocks – Red Rocks
- Liberty on the Rocks™ Denver » PPC
- Light from the Right
- MarsBlog
- Mount Virtus
- Night Twister
- Patient Power Now
- PerlStalker’s Ramblings
- Pieces of Liberty
- Reclaim the Blue!
- Seng Center
- The Cauldron
- The Constitutional Reporter
- The Daily Blogster
- The Drunkablog
- The Toxic Hypoxic
- View From a Height
- Wakalix
- WhoSaidYouSaid
July 15th, 2010 @ 9:27 am
The Fox31 political analyst suggests that without a good Plan B, republicans will likely stay home in November.
Well, speaking for myself, regardless of how this thing plays out, I am not staying home this November, and I will do my best to vote for the least statist.
This whole thing presents an opportunity to put forth a candidate who is clearly for smaller, less-funded, limited government, even more so than McInnis and Maes claim to be.