Bruce Benson for governor
by Donald E. L. Johnson | 9:34 am, July 16, 2010 | 8 Comments
A few days ago I asked who the Colorado Republicans should run for governor if Scott McInnis wins the GOP primary and then steps down. That scenario is making more sense every day, and it's becoming more likely. University of Colorado President Bruce Benson looks like the man who can make Colorado solvent and help it thrive. And, at this point Bruce Benson has the best chance of beating Governor-elect John Hickenlooper who's looking forward to an easy victory as a result of the political problems of Scott McInnis and Dan Maes. The Denver Post has declared both McInnis and Maes unfit to be governor, and so have I and other bloggers. Many, if not all, people posting on FaceBook agree. Benson's successes as the president of the University of Colorado, former chairman of the board of Metro State, the founder and builder of an oil and gas exploration business and as a two-time chairman of the Colorado Republican Party make him this year's go-to man for Colorado and the GOP. Colorado needs a smart, successful and honest governor who has proven that he can work across party lines both behind the scenes and with the state legislature. The state needs a governor who has started, grown and run a very successful business and knows the ins and outs of the energy and other industries. We need a senior statesman who has made fixing our troubled higher education institutions a personal mission. And we need a governor who knows how to run a large organization like the state government and work with a closely divided legislature as well with leaders in the private and nonprofit sectors. Although Benson is a strong conservative and Republican, during his service as the president of CU and chairman of the board of Metro State, he has shown that he can put partisanship aside. He has shown that he is a creative problem solver, and he has more economic development skills than anyone else in the state. If elected, Benson, who is 72, would immediately be treated as a lame duck. People would assume that he would be a one-term, transitional governor. Normally, being a lame duck office holder is a miserable experience for ambitious politicians. But Colorado politicians know we're in a deep hole, and they may be more willing to work across party lines with a Bruce Benson than they would with the ambitious Obama Democrat John Hickenlooper. Back in 2009, The Rocky Mountain news wrote a glowing review of Benson's first year as president of CU. The impact graphs from the article, CU chief Benson makes believers of detractors: "I think all of us that are university presidents think we're pretty good at working with legislators," [Stephen] Jordan, [president of Metropolitan State University] said. "But Bruce has a long, long history of working with political leaders and has access to people better than most of us do." That skill and others have earned Benson high marks as the first anniversary of his tenure approaches. He's demonstrated that dedication and political savvy can be more valuable than an advanced degree, particularly when education funding is in jeopardy. Even critics who publicly opposed the appointment of a millionaire oil man and big-time Republican to head the CU system are impressed. "He proved me wrong," said Stephen Ludwig, a Democrat and CU regent who voted against Benson last year. Will Benson and his politically astute wife, Marcy, be willing to take the ball one more time for Colorado? I hope so. LINKs: About President Benson: University of Colorado. CU president Benson on short list of possible McInnis replacements. By Brittany Anas. CU president discusses his plans for the future. By Nelson Garcia. Who should Colorado Republicans run for governor? The Business Word, 7.14.2010. Terrance Carrol calls on Scott McInnis to drop out of gubernatorial contest; Dan Maes must go, to. I outline scenarios for replacing McInnis and call for Maes to drop out. The Business Word, 7.13.2010.Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- PPC Training for Activists
UPDATE: Something apparently got messed up with the PayPal buttons during this past weekend’s database glitch – fixed now. Yes, it’s that time again — PPC will be conducting training classes for center-right activists on Saturday, April 20 and Saturday, April 27, at Independence Institute in Denver. The tentative class schedule is as follows: Saturday, [...]
- Holder’s First Letter to Paul Precipitates the Best Filibuster Ever
- The Lamest Twitter Argument Ever Offered?
- Return of the PPC Re-Education Camps – You Know You Want to Be There
- Supreme Courts Blesses Warrantless Surveillance of Citizens in a Kafkaesque Farce
- GOP Elite and the Ruling Class
- Do We Now Get to Call Joe Salazar a “Rapist”?




July 16th, 2010 @ 11:45 am
In what sense is Benson a “strong conservative”? How well known are his views on any of the issues the state faces today?
Based on the numerous conversations and exchanges I have had, I believe you are in a very small minority with this opinion. I see a hand-picked Benson placeholder candidacy resulting in a 10-plus point defeat and doing nothing to improve the chances of down-ticket races.
July 16th, 2010 @ 1:19 pm
I want to bring up the false notion that “by-partisanship” is necessarily good. If there is an issue that aligns with the Colorado constitution and does not violate the US Constitution then adhering to these law is absolute when you are faced with Progressives (Socialists) especially who want you to compromise.
July 16th, 2010 @ 1:43 pm
Sorry, Donald, but Bruce Benson would be a mistake of catastrophic proportions for the GOP. Not only is Benson unequivocally NOT a conservative (though he is a good guy), but he is the epitome of what is wrong with the state GOP. In no way can Benson charm tea partiers and grassroots conservatives and, frankly, I’m not even sure that he could govern well.
To be even more frank, I find your search-and-destroy attitude toward Scott McInnis to be a little less than tasteful. I understand your desire to see a better candidate for the people of Colorado to vote for. But it’s not Benson, and even if it were the way to advocate McInnis’ withdrawal from the race is not melodramatic moaning.
July 16th, 2010 @ 5:14 pm
Ben,
After I wrote the piece, I found some online discussions about Benson that show he’s more moderate on social issues than members of a Colorado GOP vacancy committee are likely to be.
In other words, the social issues folks won’t let their concerns about the state’s budget deficit and economic problems stand in the way of their determination to control the GOP. They’d rather lose to Obama Democrat Hickenlooper and legislative Democrats than give up their ability to keep the GOP in the powerless minority.
While I think Benson would have the best chance of beating Hickenlooper, it’s pretty clear that Gov.-elect Hickenlooper will have a pretty easy road to victory in November. McInnis and Maes might as well run because no other Republican has the stature or money to make a real race of it.
July 16th, 2010 @ 5:23 pm
Chris,
I appreciate that you don’t like my style, and that’s ok.
July 16th, 2010 @ 5:32 pm
Cindy,
Bipartisan compromise has built a thriving and wonderful America. I am not interested in fostering another civil war or a return to racism, not to mention more class warfare.
If Republicans act as divisive as the Democrats and Obama, the GOP will suffer the same backlash that is threatening the Dems’ power.
July 16th, 2010 @ 5:45 pm
Who do you want to run against Hick?
What are the criteria?
How will a new candidate get up to speed without personal wealth?
Do you think HIck can be beat by a late starter?
How?
Why?
Has the GOP been damaged so badly by McInnis and Maes that it won’t recover this year?
July 17th, 2010 @ 12:27 am
You made some wild claims based on what you think I meant. So from my not wanting to promote bipartisanship (that tends to weaken our laws i.e. Constitution) you link it to resulting in: divisiveness, civil war, racism, and class warfare? Get real. Three of your wild claims seem to be all race related. Why?
Cite some examples of bi-partianship you consider good.