Ken Buck probably won debate with Jane Norton
by Donald E. L. Johnson | 12:51 pm, June 30, 2010 | 4 Comments
When the leader in a political campaign goes virtually untouched in a debate with his strongest opponent, he wins. Ken Buck is leading Jane Norton by 10 to 16 points in credible polls. From what I've read, Norton didn't touch Buck, which means he won last night. I didn't cover the debate, and I haven't watched videos of it. I'm neutral in this contest for the Republicans' nomination to the U.S. Senate. The winner will take on appointed Obama Democrat Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Washington, DC).Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
In today’s environment it’s hard to find good news. But this is good news: the free market is working, and putting statists’ predictions, like Hubbert’s, to shame. Oh, the joy!
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Printing Money Doesn’t Work in Britain Either
- Oklahoma’s Constitutional Amendment Would Pit Taxpayers Against Unions
- Friday’s Unemployment Numbers: Correcting the Corrections
- Romney Woos Grand Junction, Earns Sen. King’s Endorsement
- The Borking of Netflix: movie service finds privacy law to be an inconvenience
Follow PPC
Search
WayIn
Recent Posts
- Bad News in Colorado Remediation Rates Renews Call for Transformation
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Integrating Aerial Photography in Search and Rescue
- A Few Thoughts about Volunteer Search and Rescue
- Seeing Stars: Snipers, Fraud and MP3s
- Independence Institute’s 27th Annual Founders Night Dinner Just Around the Corner
- Which Republican Will Crater for Carbon Tax?
- Which Republican will crater for carbon tax?
- Some Quick Wednesday Hits
Recent Comments
- Jeff on Sen. Udall: “Legitimate Argument” to build Keystone Pipeline in “National Interest”; Obama Administration Approved 2009 Pipeline for Economic, Strategic Reasons
- cologeek on Sen. Udall: “Legitimate Argument” to build Keystone Pipeline in “National Interest”; Obama Administration Approved 2009 Pipeline for Economic, Strategic Reasons
- Val on Sen. Udall: “Legitimate Argument” to build Keystone Pipeline in “National Interest”; Obama Administration Approved 2009 Pipeline for Economic, Strategic Reasons
- Steve Dorman on Romney Up in Latest PPP Poll, Santorum In Second; Gingrich Falters
- Chris Maj on Three cheers for data privacy, but is a ‘Right to be Forgotten’ too much?
- PerlStalker on Three cheers for data privacy, but is a ‘Right to be Forgotten’ too much?
- Brent Glenn on Progress Now Colorado 2012 Brand Survey
- Peoples Press Collective | Colorado Politics | You didn’t want your Fifth Amendment rights, anyway, did you? : on In which the Washington Bureau Chief is cryptic
- elpresidente on PPC Trainings Are Back!
- Marla Gillaspie on PPC Trainings Are Back!
When a young girl gets close to the truth about a long-forgotten mystery, a harmless adventure becomes a threat to the future of the independent commercial settlements on Mars. 
Advertise Here!
Categories
Archives
Meta
Buy a Tea Party Poster!
Blogroll
Contributors
- Anthony Surace – PPC
- Backbone Radio
- BlueCarp
- Colorado Peak Politics – ppc
- Colorado Spending Transparency
- ColoradoFreedom.net
- Complete Colorado
- Denver Metro Young Republicans
- Ed is Watching
- Energy Policy Center
- ExPat ExLawyer
- Free Colorado
- GneissGuy
- Government Underground
- Liberty on the Rocks – Red Rocks
- Liberty on the Rocks™ Denver » PPC
- Light from the Right
- MarsBlog
- Mount Virtus
- Night Twister
- Patient Power Now
- PerlStalker’s Ramblings
- Pieces of Liberty
- Reclaim the Blue!
- Seng Center
- The Cauldron
- The Constitutional Reporter
- The Daily Blogster
- The Drunkablog
- The Toxic Hypoxic
- View From a Height
- Wakalix
- WhoSaidYouSaid
June 30th, 2010 @ 2:23 pm
And Donald, just in case you’d like to see for yourself who actually won (and not rely on others’ reports), you know–ahem–where to look:
http://www.peoplespresscollective.org/2010/06/ken-buck-vs-jane-norton-in-colorado-springs/
June 30th, 2010 @ 2:43 pm
How can you say that someone won a debate you haven’t seen? Are you serious?
June 30th, 2010 @ 8:04 pm
I’m in a state RV park in CA after being on the road most of the day. Can’t view the videos. I carefully noted that my conclusion is based on my readings of reports in the media. If you care to show how Buck or Norton won or lost, made good points or blew it, please add your comments. I have a limited data plan on my Verizon card and can’t watch the videos until I get to a free wi fi and have time, which may not be for several days.
Anybody report on the scheduled McInnis/Maes debate at the Arapahoe Men’s Club this morning?
June 30th, 2010 @ 10:40 pm
Dan Maes was right on like he always is. Scott actually showed up for this event. He’s not been around for several, including tonight’s forum in Douglas County. He thinks he’s appointed or annointed, so guess he thinks we little people aren’t important.