The GOP Establishment needs a clue
by acmaurerco | 9:50 pm, May 17, 2010 | 1 Comment
A year ago on May 1, 2009 a Rasmussen poll reported that 69% of GOP voters thought the party was out of touch with their base. The report stated that the number had changed little from a survey just after election day 2008. On October 22, 2009, it was 73%.
When is the party going to get a clue?
Maybe the defeat of Senator Bob Bennett by grass-roots conservative Mike Lee in Utah will give pause. Or Gov. Crist’s withdrawal from the Florida GOP primary under pressure from Marco Rubio. Both men, by the way, are supported by Senator Jim DeMint’s Senate Conservatives Fund, which I’ve highlighted before.
In Colorado, the party’s State Assembly is this week and I’m a delegate. RSCC pick Jane Norton has decided to petition on to the primary ballot just in case. Her campaign under Josh Penry has gone negative and just today I got an email from a prominent supporter of hers attacking Ken Buck’s character and distorting his record.
Last week I got an email from the Scott McInnis campaign making a fine distinction between McInnis, who held a “consistent” stand on immigration versus Maes, whose stand “evolved”…to end up in the same place. Who cares? Only a lawyer trying to win a debate.
This is politics as usual. These negative personal attacks are what the American people are sick of. This year the fight in the Republican party is about principle: does the party stand on the conservative principles it says it does? More importantly, do it’s candidates? Arguments like “I have more experience in politics” and “I know the players, I can get things done” don’t hold nearly as much weight as they may have in the past. In fact, they are liabilities.
Here’s the clue: if you want to win in the primary AND go on to attract independents and even non-Marxist Democrats, then you had better show that you are a person of principle and that those principles prominently include limited constitutional government, fiscal responsibility and the free market.
This year’s election is not about your political career; this is a battle for life and liberty. If you’re not in this for God and the Constitution, get out now.
Tags: buck > conservative > Constitution > election > gop > Maes > McInnis > Norton > Syndicated
Comments
Featured Posts
- Open Thread: Should Dan Maes Withdraw?
(25)
Do you think Dan Maes should step aside as the Republican nominee for governor? Why or why not? If he did step aside, who do you think the vacancy committee should consider in his stead and why?
- Speak Now, or Forever Hold Your Peace… Governor’s Office seeks public comment on Colorado Supreme Court nominees
- R Block Party Second Annual Picnic
(1)
- Happy 2nd Birthday to People’s Press Collective!
(3)
- Statewide Survey Results Show Overwhelming Discontent With Incumbent Colorado Supreme Court Justices
(8)
- “The GOP Made Me Do It”
(9)
- Clear The Bench Colorado wins judgement against “frivolous, groundless, vexatious” complaint by “Colorado Ethics Watch” (CEW, pronounced “sue” – it’s what they do), awarded “tens of thousands” in legal fees
(3)

















May 18th, 2010 @ 6:40 am
“If you’re not in this for God and the Constitution”…
Ironic, isn’t it, that the Constitution expressly forbids applying a god test to political candidates.