Randy Barnett on why mandatory insurance is unconsitutional
by Brian Schwartz | 1:30 am, April 30, 2010 | Comments Off
In December I blogged about law professor Randy Barnett’s article published by the Heritage Foundation on why mandatory insurance is unconstitutional. Earlier this week The Wall Street Journal published Barnett’s article on how supporters of the new health control legislation are changing tactics:
First Congress said it was a regulation of commerce. Now it’s supposed to be a tax. Neither claim will survive Supreme Court scrutiny.
Read the whole article: The Insurance Mandate in Peril. Barnett has also been interviewed on the Healthcare Channel, which Barnett posts the videos and summarizes their content in his blog post at the Volokh Conspiracy.
Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
In today’s environment it’s hard to find good news. But this is good news: the free market is working, and putting statists’ predictions, like Hubbert’s, to shame. Oh, the joy!
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Printing Money Doesn’t Work in Britain Either
- Oklahoma’s Constitutional Amendment Would Pit Taxpayers Against Unions
- Friday’s Unemployment Numbers: Correcting the Corrections
- Romney Woos Grand Junction, Earns Sen. King’s Endorsement
- The Borking of Netflix: movie service finds privacy law to be an inconvenience




