Donald said: For me, there is guilt by association. If Buck doesn’t come out and say he thinks the campaign is distorting Norton’s record

Donald said: That Buck and Taxpayers for Liberty are showing a lack of intellectual integrity in their attacks on NORTON strongly suggests that they will show little political integrity during the campaign.

Seems Donald’s slip is showing! Indicting Buck without any evidence Buck did anything wrong.

Donald you were long ago marginalized by your bias.

Why would Ken Buck who has spent all this time establishing himself as the legitimate candidate allow and one person or organization to threaten his campaign? Ben you have always been fair but in this instance you are walking the edge when you lay blame at Ken Buck’s feet.
This group obviously is engaged in a campaign against Jane Norton. Would it be possible that the group is funded by liberal monies? If it were a liberal organization have they not struck two GOP targets with one blow? I have not seen any of the mailings or ads (perhaps they are not targeting no.colo.) to get a feel for what all the attention is about. One thing I do know is Ken Buck has worked too hard to be attacked from within by innuendos. I understand what motivates a Donald Johnson but I certainly appeal to your sense of fairplay in this regard.

iLoveTea, I believe that the members of the Tea Party organizations, 912 project groups, and Campaign for Liberty are much closer, ideologically, than progressive statists like Donald, who occupy the neo-conservative, big government wing of the GOP. So it makes sense for Donald to call off with their heads at any sign of organized insubordination amongst the grass roots of the party. They want your vote, and maybe some of your money, but not your ideas or ideals.

Yes, it’s a problem that Jane Norton won’t respond to the survey. It’s also a problem to attack somebody for not returning a survey before they were sent it.

Donald, I don’t think your private religious affiliation is any of my concern, but claiming you are “a small government, libertarian conservative in all respects” while — in other threads within the past week on the PPC — supporting anti-liberty, big government programs like the War on Drugs and War on Iran, well, it leaves me doubting any deviance from mainstream neo-con political ideology.

Ken Buck’s support amongst many Colorado Campaign For Liberty members is well-known because of his call for an auditing of the Federal Reserve. This C4L support is in large part the result of an extremely effective grass roots outreach effort by the Buck campaign — which heightened after the departure from the Senate primary of Austrian economist, and now HD-61 candidate, Luke Korkowski.

In November, Buck called on Senator Bennett to co-sponsor S.604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act, and posted a press release about it on his campaign website:

https://www.buckforcolorado.com/pressclips102k9.php

In January, Buck answered The Question correctly again in the C4L candidate survey. If you take a look at the results of the surveys, then you’ll note there’s still no response from the Norton campaign:

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/candidatesurvey.php

Good show, though, Ben and Donald, to attempt a smear of the Campaign For Liberty! If it wasn’t one of the more organized groups fighting the establishment Republican party takeover of the Tea Party movement — especially in Colorado — then some might actually take offense. A dangerous thing when economic and personal liberties are brought together again under the same tent!

NOTE: Chris Maj is a member of the Campaign For Liberty.

FYI, no, I’m not “shocked, shocked” by the TFL-type activity. I’m just sick of it.