Big Cost to Fixing Up Colorado Schools? Time to Think Outside the Box
by Eddie | 10:39 am, March 11, 2010 | 2 Comments
Ed News Colorado reports from yesterday’s State Board meeting about the state of school buildings:
Colorado schools have $17.8 billion in maintenance and renovation needs over the next eight years, according to a statewide schools facilities study released Wednesday.
The study, required as part of the 2008 Building Excellent Schools Today law, was the first-ever comprehensive structural review of 8,419 buildings, from large classroom buildings to sheds.
The $17.8 billion estimate covers only what the study calls Tier I buildings – basically those used for instruction.
The study found those buildings need $9.4 billion of deferred maintenance work between now and 2013. An additional $13.9 billion is needed for energy and educational suitability projects. A final $3.9 billion in work is estimated to be necessary from 2014-18.
That’s a gigantic cost. There isn’t much talk out there about how in the world it all could be paid for over the next several years. I haven’t taken time to look at how the costs were determined, but I’m guessing the Statewide Facility Assessment looked at conventional financing arrangements.
Colorado may never get all these capital needs met, but if we’re serious about it, we can accomplish more by thinking outside the box. I would recommend state leaders start by looking at some ideas my Education Policy Center friend Ben DeGrow brought forward in an op-ed he wrote last fall about the school shortage in Denver’s Stapleton neighborhood — particularly, public-private leasing arrangements and/or contract schooling.
It’s going to take creative leadership on many levels for Colorado to address financial shortages. I hope the Capital Construction Assistance Board is taking a look at these outside-the-box ideas and how they can be promoted at the local and state level.
Tags: Independence Institute > Innovation and Reform > school construction > School Finance > State Board of Education > Syndicated
Comments
Featured Posts
- Open Thread: Should Dan Maes Withdraw?
(25)
Do you think Dan Maes should step aside as the Republican nominee for governor? Why or why not? If he did step aside, who do you think the vacancy committee should consider in his stead and why?
- Speak Now, or Forever Hold Your Peace… Governor’s Office seeks public comment on Colorado Supreme Court nominees
- R Block Party Second Annual Picnic
(1)
- Happy 2nd Birthday to People’s Press Collective!
(3)
- Statewide Survey Results Show Overwhelming Discontent With Incumbent Colorado Supreme Court Justices
(8)
- “The GOP Made Me Do It”
(9)
- Clear The Bench Colorado wins judgement against “frivolous, groundless, vexatious” complaint by “Colorado Ethics Watch” (CEW, pronounced “sue” – it’s what they do), awarded “tens of thousands” in legal fees
(3)
















March 11th, 2010 @ 3:57 pm
Think outside the box.
Expose the wishful thinking by politically tone deaf school administrators and school board members who came up with such an outlandish and unbelievable number.
Think outside the box. Just say no. No spending on schools or anything else until Colorado’s budget deficit and PERA”s unfunded liabilities are fixed, permanently.
Think outside the box. Tell contractors slopping at the education pork trough to go away until Colorado’s taxpayers can be sure that they get what they pay for and that they can afford to pay for it. Right now, Colorado can’t afford new capital spending of any kind. It can’t afford wish list, unnecessary maintenance. Only maintenance that makes plants and equipment safe should be funded.
That anyone or organization would publish such nonsense as this report just shows out out of control the tax and spend education mafia is in Colorado.
March 12th, 2010 @ 10:57 am
Where Eddie gently urges school officials to wake up and stop blindly doing business as usual, Don makes the message blunt, strong and clear. I’d like to think at least one (or both) of the approaches will be effective.