PPC Homepage

North Denver Candidate Search 2010–Live Video Stream; **Update: Live Text Results Posted

by | 1:55 pm, February 21, 2010 | 11 Comments

Candidate Votes Percent
Michael Deming 2 2.86%
Ryan Frazier 20 28.57%
Jimmy Lakey 27 38.57%
Michael Sheely 4 5.71%
Lang Sias 17 24.29%
Total Votes 70 100.00%

Candidate Votes Percent
Stephen Bailey 29 54.72%
Bob Brancato 1 1.89%
Bill Hammons 2 3.77%
Curtis Harris 21 39.62%
Total 53 100.00%

Candidate Votes Percent
Steve Barton 0 0.00%
Ken Buck 41 47.13%
Jane Norton 2 2.30%
Cleve Tidwell 20 22.99%
Tom Wiens 24 27.59%
Total 87 100.00%

Candidate Votes Percent
Dan Maes 39 61.90%
Scott McInnis 21 33.33%
Rich Hand 3 4.76%
Total 63 100.00%

The LiveCrossing Mobile Marketing and Communications Platform transcends the conventional communication infrastructure — enabling users to create, manage, and distribute content seamlessly across SMS, Web, PSTN, Mobile, and Data mediums. By leveraging LiveCrossing, companies can engage end users and followers via SMS coupons, updates, contests, polls and inbound IVR call flows effortlessly with our web-based, drag-and-drop editor. Organizations can collect donations, streamline charitable contributions and increase campaign funds. Enterprises can communicate on conference calls in a moment’s notice with a text message sent by the organizer. Businesses can track the status of employees or deliveries without expensive smart phones and data plans. LiveCrossing simplifies communication to your most important people in the most effective way.


North Denver Candidate Search 2010–brought to you live by the People’s Press Collective.

Category: 2010, Colorado, Colorado Politics, Elections, Events, Featured, Grassroots, Liberty, Political interviews, Politics, PPC, Uncategorized, Video

Comments

  1.   GrizzlyGrannyLu
      February 21st, 2010 @ 6:49 pm

    Thank you so much PPC crew as well as the sponsors, Broomfield 9.12 Project, Denver- Front Range 9.12 Project and ROAR!

  2.   Jack Ott
      February 21st, 2010 @ 8:28 pm

    Kudos to everyone who helped put this forum together. It was as professional as any that I have seen.

    Did Ken Buck really say that to jane Norton’s representative? That was as masterful as, “I knew John Kennedy,…and you are no John Kennedy.”

  3.   Jacque
      February 21st, 2010 @ 8:30 pm

    Thank you for holding this wonderful event and for streaming it live for those that couldn’t make it to Denver. I was thrilled when I found out I was going to be able to watch it. It was like Christmas in February!!

  4.   iLoveTea
      February 21st, 2010 @ 10:07 pm

    Amazing job with the live stream. Thank you! Will you archive the video?

  5.   Keith
      February 21st, 2010 @ 11:04 pm

    Great forum today! It certainly was one of the best. Thank you to all the candidates who took the time to attend. Ken Buck really did say “Must be present to win….” to Jane Norton’s surrogate. This is the second Denver forum I have attended and the second time Jane Norton has been a no show. I am all for eliminating surrogates from participating. If you cannot make it don’t send someone in your place.

  6.   kevinallen
      February 22nd, 2010 @ 11:51 pm

    Ken Buck was dominating, and I agree that surrogates are not worth the time it takes to hear them out. Make an opening statement and move on.
    If you want to be my representative, you should show up and bring the heat- like Ken Buck does every time! How else will we know how the candidate will do against the likes of Harry Reid et al?

  7.   Theresa Niel
      February 23rd, 2010 @ 2:29 pm

    2010 is the most important election in the history of the United States for it will be the one that either changes our course from a certain demise or the one that will take us forward to the needs of the people, their communities and their States Not that of a central Orwellian bureaucracy.

  8.   Father OMalley
      February 24th, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

    Oh, boy am I gonna p.o. a lot of people.
    Let me be up front. The venue was great. The enthusiasm was superb.
    Now if we do it again. here’s some suggestions.
    I’ve talked to two candidates today about the forum.
    #1 Lighting.. and the big screen in the back. This is nice high tech fluff, but little more.
    You do not need this face on lighting for streaming. It disconnects the candidates from their audience. The screen in the back is used for powerpoint presentations and movies. It is not meant to be used as in a stadium filled with people sitting hundreds of feet away. The candidates said this detracted from the presentation.

    The candidates weren’t allowed to test the mikes before hand. Each candidate should be allowed to test the mikes and have a “monitor” speaker so they can hear how they sound.
    The auditorium lights should have been turned all the way up in the auditorium and the stage lights shut off. Again, we are not in a “play” or a huge stadium.

    Both Candidates that I spoke to almost left because of the delays and the lighting. Both candidates wanted more than a minute to respond. (heh go figure). Both candidates wanted a debate with live audience questions and questions from other candidates.

    Debate is essential, not an option.

    One liners while fun and enjoyable have nothing to do with a candidates ability to represent us and protect our constitutional rights.

    Where’s the meat?

  9.   elpresidente
      February 24th, 2010 @ 4:26 pm

    1) Have you contacted the organizers with your concerns?

    2) The candidates ostensibly agreed to the format as a term of participation. Those who can not or will not should not participate.

    3) Testing mikes and choice of lighting was outside the purview of PPC. Generally, the lighting was excellent for the live webcast, and the projected image was something the organizers wanted us to do. The darkness of the projection was a result of a rented projector.

    The feedback PPC received from both the candidates and audience we spoke with during and after the event was overwhelmingly positive. There was mention of a sound fade during the later portion of the afternoon, but that would be a venue issue. PPC controlled only the feed to the livestream and the projector, and is not responsible for the dim projector image.

    We do appreciate your concerns. Is there anything else we should be made aware of in advance of the next forum?

  10.   A Good Week for Jimmy Lakey: GOP Three-Way Race in Colorado’s 7th CD? : Peoples Press Collective
      February 24th, 2010 @ 11:52 pm

    [...] been a big week so far for GOP 7th Congressional candidate Jimmy Lakey. On Sunday he won a plurality of votes from viewers of the North Denver candidate forum. Then today, word broke on the liberal Colorado [...]

  11.   Pat Conroy
      March 5th, 2010 @ 10:06 pm

    I am so sorry to hear that Mr. O’Malley was not entirely satisfied with our event. Perhaps when he holds one himself we will be able to learn something from him. LOL! I have had nothing but positive feed back from the candidates and the guests, PPC did an excellent job, and we will be forever grateful for their generosity. Nuff said!

Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"

  • "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow

Featured Posts




  • When a young girl gets close to the truth about a long-forgotten mystery, a harmless adventure becomes a threat to the future of the independent commercial settlements on Mars.

  • Advertise Here!

    info-at-peoplespresscollective-dot-org

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Meta




  • Buy a Tea Party Poster!