Obama Wrong About Mandatory Auto Insurance
by Ari Armstrong | 11:19 pm, September 9, 2009 | 1 Comment
I watched Barack Obama's address on health policy tonight on television at Liberty On the Rocks at the Denver Tech Center. Both NPR and Fox 31 sent reporters to cover the speech and the free-market response to it. I'll have more to say about the speech in coming days. For now, I want to correct but one of Obama's remarks:"That's why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance -- just as most states require you to carry auto insurance."
It is simply not true that states "require you to carry auto insurance." Rather, you must buy auto insurance (or face fines) only if you drive an automobile on politically operated roads.
For example, Colorado's statute 10-4-619 states that "compulsory coverage" applies to "every owner of a motor vehicle who operates the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state or who knowingly permits the operation of the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state."
In other words, if you don't own a motor vehicle, or you don't drive your vehicle on "public highways," you aren't required to buy auto insurance.
It is indeed interesting that Obama sees a politically controlled industry as the model for health care.
Obama's proposal to force everybody to buy politically controlled insurance is not like the requirement to buy auto insurance for public highways. Under Obama's proposal, there is no escape and no exception. If you don't buy insurance that politicians and their appointed bureaucrats approve for you, you face hefty fines. If you want to self-insure, or if you don't like the politically-approved insurance, that's tough. You will be forced to buy it. Because Obama is all about choice, competition, and freedom. And two plus two equals five.
September 10 Update: Wesword's Michael Roberts picked up on the NPR coverage of Liberty On the Rocks and also quoted this blog post. As I pointed out in the comments, this post made a delimited point quickly. I've written much more about mandated insurance elsewhere.
Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
In today’s environment it’s hard to find good news. But this is good news: the free market is working, and putting statists’ predictions, like Hubbert’s, to shame. Oh, the joy!
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Printing Money Doesn’t Work in Britain Either
- Oklahoma’s Constitutional Amendment Would Pit Taxpayers Against Unions
- Friday’s Unemployment Numbers: Correcting the Corrections
- Romney Woos Grand Junction, Earns Sen. King’s Endorsement
- The Borking of Netflix: movie service finds privacy law to be an inconvenience





September 10th, 2009 @ 11:00 am
I’d like him to name one state that requires non-car owners/drivers to have auto insurance. If you don’t own a car, you don’t have to have auto insurance. Apparently under his plan, if you want to be alive, you have to have “health” insurance. I guess the penalty for noncompliance would be execution.