Say “no” to the expansion of police power.
by David K. Williams, Jr. | 12:55 pm, December 31, 2008 | Comments Off
The Rocky Mountain News carried a story captioned, “Cell phone use boosts accident risk, officials say.” The subhead said: “Using one at the wheel as unsafe as driving drunk, some say”
Who are these “some?” Are they police who stand to gain additional power if given the authority to stop safe drivers just because they on the phone?
The article states
“Research has shown that drivers on phones exhibit many of the same behaviors as drunk drivers. They weave. They blow stop signs. They cut off others.”
Weaving, blowing stop signs and cutting off others are all legitimate reasons for the police to stop a driver. They have that power right now.
They do not need the power to stop perfectly safe drivers because they might be negligent at a later time. All of us might become negligent at a later time.
Comments
Praise for PPC From Our Lefty "Fan"
- "Zany-ass bombast-entertainment...Hackneyed weirdo communist pseudo-nostalgia" --Alan Franklin, ProgressNow
Featured Posts
- Rising Oil Production in Alberta: More Evidence Disproving Hubbert’s Peak
In today’s environment it’s hard to find good news. But this is good news: the free market is working, and putting statists’ predictions, like Hubbert’s, to shame. Oh, the joy!
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Printing Money Doesn’t Work in Britain Either
- Oklahoma’s Constitutional Amendment Would Pit Taxpayers Against Unions
- Friday’s Unemployment Numbers: Correcting the Corrections
- Romney Woos Grand Junction, Earns Sen. King’s Endorsement
- The Borking of Netflix: movie service finds privacy law to be an inconvenience




