Dec 25 2009

Satire: Santa Claus is a registered Republican!

Category: PPC, Politics, SyndicatedSeng Center @ 2:00 pm


Here’s some Christmas satire fun to warm up your holiday in the cold.



Investigation thrusts Santa Claus, a registered Republican, into controversy

The 2008 election is well past over, but an investigation into the legal voter status of Santa Claus has concluded that the famed philanthropist is a registered Republican in Alaska, his adopted American home.

 

Claus was spotted voting in Anchorage last November, and an anonymous phone call placed to Alaskan election officials by a man claiming to be “one of Santa’s little helpers” accused Claus of voter fraud, prompting the investigation.

 

“An iceberg of evidence has confirmed that Kris Kringle, aka Santa Claus, is a legally registered voter.  Furthermore, we have concluded that Mr. Claus is Republican, and we suspect he supported John McCain in the 2008 election,” stated Jack Frost, head of the Committee to Investigate the Legal Voter Registration Status and Citizenship of Santa Claus (CILVRSCSC),an entity created by the Alaskan Voter Board against the wishes of 2008Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin.  “We also believe that Governor Palin violated ethics rules by receiving gifts from the jolly ‘ol Saint.”

 

The bi-partisan commission also included Republicans Mr. Grinch, of Whoville, and multibillionaire banker Ebenezer Scrooge, of New York City, along with Democrats Frosty T. Snowman, of Wasilla, Palin’s Alaskan hometown, and Yukon Cornelius, a prospector in Anchorage and a former associate of Claus.

 

CILVRSCSC concluded within a month that Claus is, in fact, a naturalized citizen of the United States, but further inquiry has led to conclusions about his political affiliation.  With Christmas around the corner, the commission decided to announce the results of its wide-ranging investigation.

 

“I’m a Republican,” said Grinch.  “You might not think that Santa’s a Republican because he gives joy to every child each Christmas, but we’ve found that the way he treats his workforce, his Christian views, his wealth and decision to evade corporate and personal income taxes by operating in the North Pole makes him an undeniable Republican.”

 

According to Forbes magazine, Stanley Twinkleflake, a North Pole elf and former employee at Santa’s Christmas Workshop, Inc., was banished last year from the North Pole, along with three other elves.  The reason, Claus gave, was that Twinkleflake was working to undermine the workshop through unionization.

 

Elves like Twinkleflake and other critics assert that the little fellas are working long hours in harmful conditions, at below minimum wage.

 

Claus has recently stirred controversy over his support of Wal-Mart’s refusal to provide health insurance for its employees.  That controversy reached its height last year when it was revealed the Claus has himself refused to provide his elves with health insurance.

 

Claus has also entered into some legal issues.  He insists on maintaining his workshop in the North Pole, where the U.S.government has no oversight whatsoever.

 

“It was bad enough trying to make wooden rocking horses and sleds during the depths of an arctic winter,” Twinkleflake told Forbes.  “But nowadays all the kids want is electronics. You try working with all those chemicals in perpetual darkness.  It’s practically a sweatshop.  I just hope college kids start boycotting all presents made at Santa’s Workshop.”

 

Last month, Ester “Bunny” Bumble, Claus’s senior spokesperson, disputed critics in an interview with Magical Creatures Quarterly.

 

“Elves are immortal.  With a guaranteed life of forever, why would they need health insurance? We stand by our position,” she said.

 

“Santa Claus doesn’t need illegal immigration from Mexico or to ship his workshop overseas to China to find low-wage workers,” said Holly Stockingstuffer, columnist at The Holiday Times, whose recent article critiquing Claus’s environmental practices, “Santa and Global Warming,”has won praise from Nobel prize-winner Al Gore. “Have you seen their size and their pointy ears?  No non-magical human would even think of hiring guys like that.  He’s got them right where he wants them.”

 

The only elf known to have left the North Pole is Buddy Hobbs, who turned out to be a human after all when he found his father in New York City.

 

“Santa?  I know him, I know him!” said Hobbs  “Sure, he doesn’t have the World’s Best Cupof Coffee there, but his affinity for elf culture makes things really friendly up at the North Pole.  The Santa haters are wrong—he’s not a cotton-headed ninnymoggins!”

 

Ebonezer Scrooge once refused to give to charity until he was visited by three ghosts twenty-three years ago.  He now gives$500 million annually out of his own pocket—and he proudly admits he is a registered Republican.

 

“I’m a Republican because I’m a conservative,” said Scrooge.  “Ever since meeting the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come, I have chosen to give millions of dollars of my own money to good causes each year—just like Santa spends his own money on toys and gives them to children out of his own good will, not because of government redistribution.”

 

Claus has long been known for his infinite amount of wealth.  As Forbes reported in 2005, Santa’s Christmas Workshop produces roughly 700 million toys valuing more than $14 billion a year.

 

“He could spend that money on himself, buy a condo in Vail, a tropical island in the Caribbean.  But he doesn’t.  He uses it to spread joy to kids,” said Scrooge.

 

Critics,however, don’t see much kindness in the way Clause operates.  Each year he produces a list using a crystal ball; he sees kids when they’re sleeping and knows when they’re awake.  If Claus finds a given kid nice, they get a present; naughty ones receive a lump of coal.

 

“Kringle is a Christian extremist,” said Michael O’Donnell, former television talkshow host who produced last year’s documentary film Sicko: Claus, Wal-Mart, and the Republican Conspiracy.  “Every year he runs around claiming to spread‘Christmas cheer’ through his gifts—but in reality, those kids who do not fit within his narrow view of morality find a lump of coal in their stockings!  If that isn’t radical Christianity and evidence of a right-wing extremist, I don’t know what is.”

 

Critics also point to Claus’s use of the crystal ball as inappropriate surveillance.  The American Civil Liberties Union filed a complaint against Claus four years ago.  Since the U.S. government has no jurisdiction in the North Pole, however, the practice has not been discontinued.

 

“This is just like the Bush Administration’s warrantless surveillance program,” said ACLU attorney Jen Stamper.  “He’s spying on people without permission to see if they’re ‘good’ or not.  We are calling on President Obama to distance himself from Claus.”

 

Claus’s wealth, the way his business operates, his Christianity, the fact that he’s white and old, the red color of his suit and his charitable contributions combined to reveal his Republican voter status.

 

The final piece of evidence: Alaska voter rolls have him registered as “Republican.”

 

Forbes Magazine’s “Fictional 15” and 2005 article “Santa Claus” were used for this piece. The rest of the article is the author’s original work.    Merry Christmas from Seng Center!

An investigation has concluded that the one known

as Santa Claus, now mired in controversy, is a

legally registered Republican.

Tags: ,


Dec 25 2009

Commercialism Only Adds to Joy of the Holidays

Category: PPCBrian T. Schwartz @ 11:23 am

Some excerpts from Onkar Ghate of the Ayn Rand Institute in US News and World Report:
I’m an atheist, and I love Christmas. If you think that’s a contradiction, think again. …

“The best aspect of Christmas,” Ayn Rand once observed, is “that Christmas has been commercialized.” The gift buying “stimulates an …

Tags:


Dec 25 2009

Merry Christmas to all (yes, even the Colorado Supreme Court) from Clear The Bench Colorado!

Merry Christmas from Clear The Bench Colorado!

nola_christmas

In the spirit of the season today, no commentary or analysis on Colorado Supreme Court rulings that have taken money out of your pocket, eroded your constitutional rights, or usurped the powers of other branches of government.  No comparisons of the Mullarkey Majority to the Grinch Who Stole Christmas

Matt and celebrity spokespup Nola (above) just want to wish everyone a happy time at their not-yet-seized-by-eminent-domain homes and a safe, painless drive in their FASTER-taxed cars to Grandma’s house (assuming she can still afford the increased taxes to live there, for now and in Christmas future).  Be merry and don’t think about taxes for now (although they’ll beat you up if you don’t hand it over).

Enjoy your Christmas present, but please act to save your Christmas future - exercise YOUR right to vote “NO” on the four unjust justices of the Mullarkey Majority (Justices Michael Bender, Alex Martinez, Nancy Rice, and Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey) who need YOUR approval to continue taking away your constitutional rights: your right to vote on tax increases, your right to defend your homes and business from seizure by rapacious governments, and your right to enjoy the benefits of the rule of law, not rule by activist, agenda-driven “justices.”  Support Clear The Bench Colorado with your comments (Sound Off!), your contributions, and your “NO” vote on retaining these unjust justices in 2010!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Dec 25 2009

Merry Christmas and Happy Kung Pao Chicken

Category: SyndicatedRossputin @ 4:43 am

To all of my Christian friends, I wish  you a very Merry Christmas.

To all my Jewish brethren, I wish you a lovely traditional Jewish Christmas meal: Chinese food

Tags: ,


Dec 24 2009

Senate passes health care bill. Is the battle over?

Category: PPCBrian Schwartz @ 2:03 pm

The Senate has passed the health care (”reform” =  entrenchment-of-everything-bad-about-health-care-policy) bill. But is the battle over?  From Dan Perrin at Red State on Jim DeMint’s objection to conferee appointments:

because of the Senator DeMint’s objection, unless the House votes for the Senate bill unchanged — which is highly unlikely (see below) — then the Senate ObamaCare bill must be amended on the House floor to gain the votes they need to pass it on the House floor. And because of Senator DeMint’s objection to the appointment of the conferees, there will be no conference, or conference report.

If the House amends the Senate bill, they then have to send the amended bill back to the Senate — where all the 60 vote margin cloture votes still apply — cloture on the motion to proceed, and cloture to end the filibuster and cloture on any amendment.

Do I believe that this objection to the appointment of the conferees will kill ObamaCare? Yes, if the progressives or those 64 House Democrats who voted for the Stupak amendment do not roll over and play dead.

Lots of “in the trenches” political maneuvering here. Read the whole post for details. (Via FIRM)

Grace-Marie Turner at National Review describes growing opposition (though isn’t this too late?):

Fears that the bill will be a budget buster were reinforced by Wednesday’s Congressional Budget Office post showing the Senate bill double-counts Medicare savings. …

And opposition from outside groups that have been relatively quiet until now is growing:

According to Politico:  “Some of the biggest employers in the U.S. are warning that a provision in the Senate’s proposed health-care overhaul could lead to cuts in retiree benefits and a sharp reduction in reported earnings next year.

… The AFL-CIO has joined the corporate giants in an unusual alliance to warn the provision would encourage companies to drop drug benefits for millions of retirees.”

They will join the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has been out front from the beginning with its concerns, as well as doctors groups representing more than 240,000 physicians, and now the National Federation of Independent Business.  The NFIB came out strongly last week against the Senate bill, saying it “is short on savings and long on costs, is the wrong reform, at the wrong time and will increase healthcare costs and the cost of doing business.”

And the new “Start Over” new coalition of leading business organizations, including the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Retail Federation, and many others said the Senate bill “will lead to higher costs and increased burdens on small businesses. The bill will cause greater damage to our economy and health care system …[and] will impose new burdens on small businesses.”

Read her whole post.

Tags: ,


Dec 24 2009

We The People - Ray Stevens - Merry Christmas

Category: PPCMr. Bob @ 8:54 am

#tcot #obamacare #beck #glennbeck #teaparty
Merry Christmas to all. Happy Holidays if you don’t celebrate the birth of the son of God. I leave you with this today. The indomitable Ray Stevens, telling Congress and the President just what We the People think of Obamacare.

Tags: ,


Dec 24 2009

What a surprise: Democrats lied about health reform “savings”

Category: Health Reform, SyndicatedRossputin @ 3:50 am

To the surprise of nobody to the right of Chris Matthews, the CBO reported yesterday that Democrats are double-counting savings in their so-called “reform” bill.  Essentially they claim money as saved in Medicare costs but allow government to spend that money on other things – while just counting the savings.

The accounting minutiae are somewhat complicated, but explained reasonably well HERE and HERE.  The error, about $300 billion over 10 years, means that the current bill, even with its massive up-front tax hikes, will add about $170 billion to the deficit (and that’s accepting the Democrats’ unrealistic assumptions) rather than the initial claim that it will cut $130 billion.  In all likelihood, the numbers will be MUCH worse as people change their behavior to avoid costs or get their free lunch.

Although I have been somewhat tough on the CBO in these pages from time to time, it is clear that CBO Director Doug Elmendorf is tired of the Democrats’ shenanigans, gaming the CBO score for political purposes.  In his letter to Senator Jeff Sessions, Mr. Elmendorf was as devastating to Democrats’ claims as someone in an utterly non-partisan position could be.

Here’s Senator Sessions on TV laying out his discussion with Elmendorf:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK9QEkUQLeQ

Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) called the Democrats’ claims of savings “Madoff Accounting”.

This is very big news just hours before the final Senate vote on Harry Reid’s “legislative train wreck” that is health care “reform”.  But at the end of the day, it’s very hard to see any Democratic Senator changing his or her vote.

Just when the Democrats thought the political ramifications of being forced by Harry Reid and Barack Obama to support a bill that is not even popular with the liberal base (because the bill isn’t socialist enough), it has now gotten even worse since several of them has said that they will not support a bill that is not at least deficit-neutral, if not better.  Putting aside the fact that all of the bills will be much worse in terms of deficit than the CBO score, now they can’t even honestly claim a CBO score that doesn’t increase the deficit.

Democrats in Congress are being put in the position of having to lie – transparently, obviously lie – because of the political demands of their party’s leadership and the brass knuckles Chicago politics of Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel.

Any Democrat who claimed to support fiscal responsibility and is thinking of supporting this bill at its final vote can already see the campaign ads which will be run against him or her at the next election: “You lie!”

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

Jimmy Lakey Runs for 7th Congressional

Category: UncategorizedAri @ 11:10 pm

I attended the Red Rocks Liberty On the Rocks December 7 meeting, where Adam Schrager discussed his inspiring book about Ralph Carr. Jimmy Lakey, a candidate for Colorado’s 7th Congressional district, also attended that meeting, so I pulled out my audio recorder and asked him some questions.

In business Lakey promotes Christian music. Lakey adopted a son from Africa and continues to participate in charity work there. His biographical notes take up Part I.

For Part II, Lakey said he is running to protect the future of his son as a new American citizen. He said he is not and does not want to be a career politician. He questioned the decision of Ryan Frazier — another Republican in the race — to extend same-sex benefits in Aurora in a time of fiscal downturn.

For Part III, Lakey contrasted his views with those of incumbent Ed Perlmutter. While Lakey stressed his fiscal conservatism, Lakey also discussed his “faith-based beliefs” and endorsed the “personhood” measure slated for the 2010 ballot (defining a fertilized egg as a person).

Tags:


Dec 23 2009

“Obama’s Jokers” Goes National with ObamaCare Bill

picture-72

“Obama’s Jokers” at Gateway Pundit.

Michelle Malkin and Mark Steyn on the “Obama’s Jokers” phenomenon:

PPC’s Halloween “Joker Face” parody of Lady Gaga’s “Poker Face” appears quite prescient now:


Dec 23 2009

Kevin Miller’s National Freedom Initiative: A Reincarnation of Frank Meyer’s Fusionism?

Category: Colorado Politics, Liberty, PPCBen @ 5:03 pm

In his latest offering, former state legislative leader Mark Hillman praises the “freedom nationally, virtue locally” National Freedom Initiative of Colorado’s own Kevin Miller — not the first time it has crossed my path. It was last year about this time I wrestled a lot with the role social conservatism should play, and something that never strays too far from my mind.

Therefore, I’m very intrigued by this initiative — which, of course, is not altogether new, but rather a very sensible clarification and reformulation for our current political context. The opportunity definitely is there:

  • To educate many social conservatives on the vital and wholly compatible value of liberty and limited government
  • To build a strong bridge between the Right-leaning faith-based community and the Tea Party & 9/12 movements (where I’m sure a lot of overlap already exists)
  • (At the least) To have ongoing, important debates that can help hone views and broader strategies heading into the 2010 election and beyond

Just maybe, Miller is vying to be the Frank Meyer for a new generation of the conservative movement. For more, watch Miller and state senator Ted Harvey hash out the issues on a recent episode of Independent Thinking with host Jon Caldara (parts 1 through 3):

Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

Barone: Current Health Care Fiasco Resembles 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act

Category: Health Reform, Liberty, PPCBen @ 4:34 pm

Writing for the Washington Examiner, Michael Barone makes an astute historical observation:

It’s time to blow the whistle on two erroneous statements that opponents and proponents of the health care legislation being jammed through Congress have been making. Republicans have been saying that never before has Congress passed such an unpopular bill with such important ramifications by such a narrow majority. Barack Obama has been saying that passage of the bill will mean that the health care issue will be settled once and for all.

The Republicans and Obama are both wrong. But perhaps they can be forgiven because the precedent for Congress passing an unpopular bill is an old one, and the issue it addressed has long been settled, though not by the legislation in question.

That legislation was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854….

(Forehead slap) Why didn’t I think of that sooner? Read the rest of Barone’s piece to get the gist of the analogy and the immediate fallout from the legislation:

We cannot say with assurance that the Kansas-Nebraska Act was unpopular; Dr. Gallup didn’t start polling until 81 years later. But the results of the next election were pretty convincing. The Republican Party was suddenly created to oppose the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the 1854-55 elections transformed the Democrats’ 159-71 majority to a 108-83 Republican margin. Democrats didn’t win a majority of House seats for the next 20 years.

Not to mention, as Barone also points out, the fallout of “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the national conflagration known as the Civil War. In any case, as bad as next year looks like it will be for Congressional Democrats, I still have a hard time imagining a shakeup on the order of magnitude of what took place in 1854.

There are some key differences, too — namely, that support for the Kansas-Nebraska Act (on both a partisan and sectional basis) was not nearly so unanimously divided as what we’re witnessing today in Washington. While I also don’t see anything comparable to the downfall of the Whig Party in today’s politics, it is clear that there is some significant re-alignment taking place among coalitions.

For the best read on the subject of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and its integral role in pushing America into the secession crisis and the Civil War, I highly recommend David B. Potter’s The Impending Crisis, 1848-1861.

Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

Maes Talks Taxes, Abortion, and Eminent Domain

Category: UncategorizedAri @ 4:00 pm

I have been dismissive of Dan Maes, who is challenging presumptive front-runner Scott McInnis for the Republican nomination for governor. (See my first, second, and third set of comments.) But Maes shows up and answers questions, and that counts for a lot. His tenacity earns him at least a second glance — especially given that McInnis is the ideal candidate of few.

I talked with Maes at the December 21 Liberty On the Rocks holiday party (er, “Christmas party!”) hosted by the Independence Institute. We talked about a number of issues, but I assured him the conversation was off the record. He also complained that I had not given enough consideration to his candidacy. So I figured I’d invite him to further articulate some of things we talked about, on the record. I sent him five questions, which he generously answered. My questions are in bold.

I appreciate you giving me your time at the II event to discuss your campaign.

I would like to again give you the opportunity to further articulate your views, on the record. I have a number of questions arising from our conversation. I will be happy to publish your replies, unaltered, on my web page.

1. As governor, what would be your role in dealing with the military’s desire to expand Pinon Canyon operations? [See the write-up about McInnis's statements on eminent domain for background.]

I would like to act as a mediator and seek out a mutually beneficial solution if possible. I do not see issues like this as zero sum. I only have the ranchers’ input thus far and they have presented a very strong case for preservation based on many valuable criteria not limited to private property rights, less federalization of state land, and cultural history. I await the Army’s position in detail beyond a GAO report that has unaddressed exemptions in it.

2. Generally, when do you believe eminent domain is appropriate, if ever?

It is a constitutionally acceptable process and should be applied on a case by case basis. Application of the practice should only be exercised when there is a clear and convincing case for a purely public use and benefit.

3. Please explain what specific economic policies you would adopt. Would you seek to cut specific taxes?

Yes, personal income tax and business property tax. Possibly explore a Fairtax (consumption tax).

Cut specific state programs?

Yes, TBD.

Roll back specific economic controls?

Clarify please.

[I was under the impression that Maes wanted to cut certain regulations on business, and I was trying to figure out which regulations he might want to repeal or modify. I will be happy to post Maes's additional comments on the matter if he cares to send them.] Many politicians, including W. Bush and Obama, promised to cut taxes, so I’m looking for some specific proposals.

I see our energy industry and the accompanying tax revenues as an enormous potential for our state just like our energy producing neighbors. With aggressive and responsible energy policies we could increase these revenues dramatically. Simultaneously, I have articulated my position on downsizing government FTE [full-time employees] by up to 4000.

I will defend Tabor while seeking a better balance with the effects of Amendment 23. I am a strong advocate for public schools as I have two children attending them, however; we must seek more fiscally responsible reform.

Cutting taxes is part of my plan but only after we have struck an appropriate sizing of state government and started a statewide recovery.

4. As you know, the Colorado legislature directs corporate welfare to a variety of industries, including tourism and energy. What are your views of corporate welfare?

I would like to examine the specifics in each case. Our state constitution clearly states we are not to make investments in private entities. I want to honor the spirit of our federal and state constitutions. I do see tax breaks as viable incentives to spur our economy.

5. The “personhood” measure slated for the 2010 ballot states, “As used in sections 3, 6, and 25 of Article II of the state constitution, the term ‘person’ shall apply to every human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being.” Please explain your views on this measure.

I support it with the understanding that the life of the child is equal to that of the mother and shall never be considered more important than that of the mother.

I appreciate your pledge to answer the survey coming soon from my dad and me. That will probably come out the first days of January.

In closing, understand that we have 3 months until caucuses, 5.5 months until state assembly, and 11 months until the general election. It is still a tad early to have all the answers but I hope I have given you something to start with. Contrary to my opponent, I do have a copy of the current state budget and will continue to examine it, get consultation on it, and come
ready to provide even more specifics in the near future. Thank you.

I will indeed be interested to see whether McInnis is as forthcoming in his answers to the upcoming survey. (I also hope the survey prompts even more specific and revealing answers from Maes on a variety of issues.) I believe the voters of Colorado deserve to know where candidates stand on the issues.

By the way, a People’s Press Collective article discusses some of the recent comments of the candidates, including McInnis’s comments about the CSU gun ban.

Talking both with Maes and with Clive Tidwell, the underdog in the U.S. Senate race, I picked up a “throw the bums out” vibe, which is to be expected from candidates with no political experience running against seasoned former politicians. However, I have no interest in replacing one bum with another, potentially worse one. While experience and biography do matter in these political races, I hope ultimately they are about fundamental ideas and their application to policy. So I will continue to try to get candidates to articulate their ideas and policies as fully as possible. I hope the voters — and other political writers — join me in this.

Tags: , , , , ,


Dec 23 2009

Is Our Side Silly Enough to Make “Mark Udall Sits Silently…” Headlines?

Category: Colorado Politics, PPCBen @ 3:49 pm

Two days ’till Christmas — which apparently means it’s time to practice our jolly laughter. Huffington Post’s Sam Stein looks like he is auditioning to fill the local void left by the departure of Colorado Media Matters. What a doozy (H/T Complete Colorado):

Appearing at a recent coffee-shop event with Colorado voters, Norton sat silently while a female attendee declared twice that President Barack Obama is a Muslim and while a male attendee insisted that the president — who he deemed “an idiot” — wanted to let babies die on the side of the road “with the garbage.”

“Well as you can tell there is a lot of passion around what is happening in our own country,” Norton responded to the crowd, rather than correcting either individual. “And how we can channel that into positive constructive ways that will get our vote out it is going to be absolutely critical.”

Also at the event, Norton praised the “tea-party movement and the 9/12 groups” for pushing a right-wing populist, anti-Washington agenda….

Whoa. Scandalous… Not. Doesn’t the whole HuffPo piece remind you of CMM’s infamous “Talk show host allowed guest to say…” headlines filled with vastly more breathless prose than substance or logic?

The headline reads: “Jane Norton, GOP Candidate, Sits Silently as Obama Called a Muslim.” How dare she not excoriate a citizen who bothered to come hear her speak for insinuating that the President is an adherent of one of the world’s major religions! And how dare she not meticulously deconstruct the crudely articulated views of someone disgusted with Barack Obama’s pro-abortion voting record! How dare she try to channel their energies “into positive constructive ways”!

But perhaps if Jane Norton had closely studied Mark Udall’s approach during the 2008 statewide campaign when confronted by angry Lefties calling George Bush a Nazi and accusing him of killing babies:

“Now, first of all, I want to clear the air about something you mentioned in your comment,” Udall said. “It technically isn’t true that President Bush is a Nazi. He doesn’t wear militaristic uniforms, speak German, goose-step or make that corny salute. Not to mention he’s several inches taller than Hitler was. And look, as tempting as it might be to do, I don’t really think we can say definitively that the President decided to make the illegal invasion of Iraq for the purpose of killing babies. Many civilians have died, but it’s not our place to judge Bush’s motives….”

Of course, that’s a fictional quote. And of course, mistakenly calling the President a Muslim is not comparable to slandering the President as a Nazi sympathizer. Do we have any record of how Mark Udall responded in friendly Lefty audiences when people would throw out random slurs against then-President Bush? What would you expect him to do? Maybe the comparison will help illuminate the absurdity.

Anywa, I glean at least a couple observations from the HuffPo piece:

  1. Some Lefties don’t realize how desperate, pathetic and out-of-touch they sound
  2. Far more than any comments from Norton supporters might convince me, I’m now more persuaded of her perceived frontrunner status … can you imagine one of the big Lefty online sites going out of its way to make such baseless, petty attacks on Ken Buck, Tom Wiens, or even Cleve Tidwell?

Well, maybe Buck. Nevertheless, you have to admit the piece is quite amusing.

Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

More Constitutional Misunderstanding

Category: PPC, SyndicatedDavid K. Williams, Jr. @ 10:15 am

Linda Lodenkamper wrote a letter to the editor of the Denver Post taking the paper to task for its position regarding Stephanie Villafuerte.

Ms. Villafuerte had been nominated to become Colorado’s next U.S. Attorney. A controversy arose and she withdraw her name from consideration. Ms. Lodenkamper wrote:

Your editorial applauding this action ends with the following statement: “Villafuerte may not have done anything wrong, but from what she’s said publicly, she lacks the ability to prove it.” When did your newspaper change to “Guilty until proven innocent?”

This is an all too common misunderstanding. The concept of “innocent until proven guilty” has exactly one application - in a criminal court room.
It has no application to politics. None.

BlueCarp

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

Public Policy Roundtable

Category: PPC, democratic national conventionjccaldara @ 5:27 am

Big Government Santa is coming, and the Grinches at the Independence Institute are going to stop him. On this week’s Independent Thinking I’m joined by a roundtable of Independence Institute policy center directors including Penn Pfiffner from the Fiscal Policy Center, Pam Benigno form the Education Policy Center, and Jessica Peck Corry from the Campus Accountability Project. Tune in for a holiday-themed discussion about what the free-market freedom fighters at the Independence Institute have been up to in 2009, and what is ahead for 2010. That’s Friday, December 25th at 8:30 pm on KBDI Channel 12, re-broadcast the following Monday at 1:30 pm.

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

We have met the enemy; Tea Party II, here we come

Category: Politics, SyndicatedRossputin @ 4:07 am

It becomes clearer on a daily basis, from bribes to Senators to get votes to Pelosi’s refusal to let Republicans participate in a press conference in Copenhagen, that America is no longer a Republic, but a dictatorship, at least until the next election.

The latest, and one of the most egregious examples, is exposed at RedState.com yesterday in an article entitled “We Are No Longer a Nation of Laws. Senate Sets Up Requirement for Super-Majority to Ever Repeal Obamacare.”

I encourage you to read the article, but if you don’t have time here’s the short version:

Changing Senate rules requires a 2/3 supermajority of 67 votes.  However, a provision in Reid’s health care “reform” bill (which people including Senators are just having a chance to read now even though it already passed) includes a provision which changes long-standing Senate rules by making it “out of order” for the Senate to consider a change to a section of the bill.  This means the process by which the bill would be changed is governed by a new “rule” which itself would require a supermajority to change.  Therefore, unlike almost every other piece of legislation and in defiance of years of Senate tradition, that part of the bill which “applies to regulations imposed on doctors and patients by the Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels” is nearly impossible to amend or repeal.

When Senator Jim DeMint questioned the Senate President about the rule change, he was told that it was simply a “procedural change”, which is an outright lie.

Not only is this an indictment of the new tyranny of the Democrats, it also shames the Senate Parliamentarian who, for the second time in a week has allowed the Senate to break long-standing rules that every Senator understands. (The first time was when they allowed Bernie Sanders amendment, the 767 pages of which was being read in full at the demand of Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), to be pulled and the reading stopped.  Senate rules are clear that if any Senator objects, the reading must continue once started even if the amendment is not going to be voted on.)

Harry Reid is a shameless thief of Americans’ money, economic liberty, and now our very political system.  The Democrats who go along with him are co-conspirators in actions that are economically devastating and irrational if the true goal were health care reform, which if course it isn’t.  Beyond that, however, the frontal assault on the structure of our rule of laws is beyond what should be permissible even if you accept the premise that “people get the government they deserve.”

Democrats have twice broken the rules of the Senate in their mad rush to pass anything no matter how bad, no matter how much the public is against it, in order to claim a political victory for Democrats and defend Barack Obama from a devastating defeat so early in his presidency.  The Democrats are probably right that antipathy toward them and their bill will initially soften if it is signed by the President.  But they are probably wrong to think that temporarily-lessened hatred of them and their law will not soon be swamped by an outpouring of grassroots clamor which could make this year’s Tea Parties and Town Hall meetings look like demure little warm-up gatherings.  The political fodder for Republicans conservatives is enormous if only they learn how to use it, something they’ve not done well so far (particulary Senator McConnell, who has a lot to answer for.) One can already think of a half-dozen good ads attacking Democrats in what will certainly be the most aggressive attempt by the GOP to “nationalize” elections in many years.  Polls are showing the public being repulsed by the Democrats’ heavy-handed government takeovers, or attempted takeovers, of…everything.

As a secondary effect, I believe that RINO Republicans, whether in Congress now or candidates for office, such as Florida’s Charlie Crist will be badly damaged by the Democrats actions.  The picture of Crist with Obama, which was probably already worth 5 percentage points for Marco Rubio, will now be worth at least 10.  I will go out on a limb and say Rubio wins the nomination.  (Not as much of a limb as it was when I first contributed to Rubio’s campaign.)  I should also note that I heard Rubio on the Hugh Hewitt radio show a few days ago and was extremely impressed.  I think recent events are the political death of Ben Nelson, and maybe of Mary Landrieu.  I certainly hope so.

The key to the survival of our Republic now is that no Supreme Court Justice, and particularly no conservative Justice, leave the court until after the next election.  If we get another Sotomayor, especially if that person replaces a conservative, this country will be devastated for years to come.  Don’t forget, as recent events prove, for liberals the end justifies the means.  Rules are annoyances to be cast aside if it means grabbing more power for the government over your life.  And since we can no longer count on the president, regardless of his political party, to defend the Constitution, we’re left sadly reliant on a Court that is already barely reliable.

Finally, with all that said, I reiterate my view that I’m glad John McCain lost.  McCain is a RINO.  If he represents winning, then the nation is already lost. A McCain government would have been just a slightly slower version of an Obama government.  In the spirit of someone whose son’s middle name is Rand, let the voters get a good hard dose of the happy-faced fascism which they have voted into office. Let them learn once and for all that even for people who do not see liberty as an end in itself (as I see it), the tangible results of the loss of liberty, particularly economic liberty, are devastating.  It’s going to take a hard, expensive lesson for the benumbed complacent American populous to wake up and realize who the enemy is.  Luckily, Reid, Pelosi, and Obama are making it easier for Americans to see evil than it has been for many years.

Tags: ,


Dec 23 2009

Health care bill, arbitrary power & dictatorship

Category: PPCBrian Schwartz @ 1:30 am

From Duke Visiting Professor John David Lewis in Pajamas Media:

The essence of a dictator’s method is not to write harsh laws and enforce them rigidly. The world’s most destructive thugs have wanted something different. They have wanted to impose their wills on a compliant populace using arbitrary power — power not limited by laws or constitution, but power that was open-ended, ill-defined, and could be expanded based on the whims of the moment. …

Does a law or a bill constrain the power of officials — both elected and appointed — by the principles of the law? Or does it empower the officials to define the meaning of the law as they wish, to apply it in an open-ended manner, and to write regulations in order to expand their power?

Professor Lewis explains how the House health bill, HR 3962, is open-ended and expands power. Surely the Senate health bill, HR 3590, does the same.  Read the article: Arbitrary Power, Dictatorship, and Health Care.

(via FIRM)

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

Colorado Gubernatorial Candidates Scott McInnis and Dan Maes - in their own words

The race to determine the Republican challenger to face vulnerable incumbent Governor Bill Ritter continues…

To date, the remaining candidates for the GOP nomination have shared a forum on only two occasions (to my knowledge) prior to appearing on Backbone Radio last weekend:

First, the top-level statewide elections were profiled at the Colorado Federation of Republican Women (CFRW) convention in Colorado Springs on Saturday, October 24th.

Shortly thereafter, both candidates (along with then-candidate Josh Penry) shared the stage at the Colorado Governor Candidate Forum at Colorado Christian University (CCU) on video!) on November 3rd.

Although Dan Maes (along with most Colorado U.S. Senate candidates, all four candidates for Congressional District 4, and Clear The Bench Colorado’s Matt Arnold) were present at the Candidate Search 2010 event at the Budweiser Events Center in Loveland on Friday, November 13th, Scott McInnis did NOT appear (maybe he’s superstitious?) nor, apparently, did he even respond to the invitation - explaining some of the skepticism with which he is received by many grassroots organizations such as the 912 Groups and Tea Party organizations.  The damage is (probably) not irreparable - but McInnis will have to work hard to gain the support of these large (and growing!), active, and highly-motivated grassroots groups.  (HINT: showing up would be a good start).

Since I happen to be among those who believe that a competitive, fair, spirited yet respectful primary can be to the benefit of both candidates and party, I urge voters to take a good look at all candidates in the race.

Recently (13 December), former Congressman Scott McInnis and businessman Dan Maes each appeared for a half-hour interview on the Backbone America radio show (Sundays 5-8PM on 710 AM KNUS).  Each candidate was asked a nearly identical set of questions by Backbone Radio host John Andrews (and guest co-hosts Karen Kataline and Matt Schmitz).  Their answers were NOT identical - and provide some insight into the policies, principles, and character of each candidate for the state’s top job.

Listen to the radio interviews for Scott McInnis (here) and Dan Maes (here) on Backbone Radio.

Although both candidates presented themselves reasonably well, I was troubled by some of the responses - two in particular from Scott McInnis are worthy of additional comment.

 First, when asked about the recent decision by the CSU board of governors to ban licensed concealed carry permit holders from campus (as pointed out by host John Andrews, in apparent violation of state law - which will likely be ultimately decided by the Colorado Supreme Court), (at about the 13 minute mark) McInnis punted - first to the legislature, to “see what they’re going to do”; then to the “students at CSU” who “oughtta have their own vote on it” (message to McInnis: they did, voting overwhelmingly (21-3) against the ban); then to the CSU Board of Governors (again, note to Scott: the CSU Board has no authority to trump state law); and concluding by stating “I’m not the kind of Governor who likes to jump right in the middle of every controversy that goes on at the local level.” (13:45 - 13:56)

Wow.  Congressman McInnis may want to bone up on the responsibilities of the executive branch in general, and the office of Governor in particular: enforcing and upholding state law is pretty high up there in terms of priority of responsibilities.

Second, McInnis’ refusal to firmly commit to repealing the “FASTER” Colorado Car Tax (echoing an earlier perceived “waffling” on removing a pledge to reverse the increased vehicle registration “fees” from the Contract for Colorado/Platform for Prosperity last month) remains particularly jarring.  McInnis correctly identifies the FASTER vehicle registration “fee” increase as a tax that “should have gone to a vote of the people” - but then inexplicably refuses to commit to overturning this blatantly unconstitutional law.  To his credit, McInnis DOES seem to commit to vetoing any future legislation that “attempts to go around the TABOR amendment” or “an attempt to label a tax increase with some other label” (like “freeze” or “fee”)  - although he doesn’t use the “V” word itself.  Take a stand, Scott!  The citizens of Colorado will back a man of principle.

Dan Maes opened well, highlighting his experience as an executive and the grassroots support he’s gained by showing up at countless events across the state.  He continued with the ‘line” (his words) that “you’ve got to look a candidate in the eye, you’ve got to shake his hand, and then you’ve got to decide if you trust this person or not - and that’s ultimately what people want in a leader, like a governor.” (around 4:15)

Maes also provided unambiguous responses to the questions on the CSU gun ban (he opposes the ban, and supports upholding state law allowing permit holders to carry concealed - @ the 6:15 mark) and the FASTER Colorado Car Tax (stating that “it needs to be rolled back” - @ the 7:10 mark), chastising McInnis for failing to provide a “straightforward answer” to either question.

Maes did stumble a bit on a response to a question on states rights, and unnecessarily rose to the bait on being characterized as “belligerent” in his stance on some issues - but got the substance right, and gave clear, solid responses.

It’s worth listening to both candidate interviews in their entirety - then, draw your own conclusions on which candidate is worthy of support through the caucuses and assemblies up through the primary.

Healthy debate makes for a stronger candidate and a stronger party - may the best man win!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Dec 22 2009

Denver Post: “Udall, Bennet should say ‘no’” to health bill

Category: Colorado, PPCBrian Schwartz @ 8:39 pm

From the Denver Post’s Editorial Board on HR 3590:

Udall, Bennet should say “no”
Colorado’s senators should take a principled stand and vote against the travesty that the Senate health care bill has become.

In passing a test vote on health- care legislation in the early morning hours Monday, the Senate failed miserably in its goal of reining in our nation’s runaway medical costs. The situation is so dire, and the hour so late, that extraordinary action is necessary.

We call on Colorado Sens. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet to take a principled stand against the travesty the Senate legislation has become.

We do so because the deal-making and the concessions made to reach 60 votes have created a bill so poisonous to the stated ideals of both senators that they should be unable to attach their good names to its passage when it comes up for a scheduled vote on Christmas Eve.

To buy a “yes” vote from Sen. Ben Nelson, for example, the bill will fully fund the Nebraskan’s home-state Medicaid program, at a cost of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars over the next decade.

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

E-Books: Amazon Versus Barnes and Noble

Category: UncategorizedAri @ 7:55 pm

I’ve been complaining quite a lot about Amazon’s e-book service. My basic complaint is that, because of Amazon’s proprietary software, Amazon e-books will only play on devices supported by Amazon’s reader software. Presently that excludes my Mac, which means that the only way I could buy Amazon e-books was to also buy Amazon’s Kindle (or an iPhone or Touch, which runs the software).

I don’t want to buy a Kindle because it does way more than what I want it to do, and as a result it is quite overpriced for my budget and needs.

Thankfully, I have friends who tend to be early adopters of new technology. One of these friends (Diana Hsieh) lent me her Kindle for a few days so that I could check it out. This was quite helpful, because, as Amazon has no physical store front, it is otherwise impossible to pick up and play around with the Kindle before buying it.

I also purchased Karen Armstrong’s The Case for God from Barnes and Noble (BN), because it will read on my computer (with the BN reader) and I wanted to try it out. I’m contemplating buying several more books through BN but I worry that they won’t read on the e-reader I may ultimately buy and that I won’t be able to integrate my purchases from different suppliers. (The word is that Apple is also getting into the e-book game, which could change the industry dramatically.)

BN’s Nook is not yet available for purchase, so I cannot directly compare the two services. I’m reading the God book on my Mac screen and comparing that with text on the Kindle. But that’s what I have to work with.

I’ll begin with the BN e-book. It was easy to buy (once I set up my account), and the BN e-reading software installed and functioned flawlessly. The text looks fabulous on my great Mac screen, and it is easy to increase the font size and resize the window for a narrower column of text.

There is a huge disadvantage with the BN e-book and a minor one. The huge disadvantage is that the e-book will only read with the BN e-reader software, which bugs the living hell out of me. What is the point of having universal formats like pdf and HTML if e-book sellers refuse to use those formats? By contrast, an mp3 song you buy from any vendor will play on any device on the standard software. You don’t buy mp3s from Amazon that play only on the Amazon music reader. (Apple-formatted songs will only play on iTunes, but, as I’ve noted, Apple can get away with this because the company is so great at making players.)

Incidentally, today I spent $63.10 at the Cato Institute’s store to purchase seven e-books. These were straight pdf downloads, so I don’t have to worry about the compatibility issues of DRM. I do think that publishers should sell both pdf and HTML formats so that users can select the format best adapted to the reading device.

The minor disadvantage is that the BN e-book has no standardized page numbers. Instead, the pagination adjusts to the window and text. The problem is that BN e-books are useless for citation purposes, unless we’ve gotten to the point where nobody cares about page references because books are so easily searchable. If I do a review of the book, I’ll look up the page numbers, ironically, with Amazon’s “look inside” feature. Perhaps that should give Amazon the idea that its business model in this area sucks.

There are some advantages to reading an e-book on a computer screen that I did not anticipate. For note-taking, I can easily open a text window next door. The BN e-book allows the reader to cut-and-paste short passages, which is awesome. I also love the way the endnotes work. Click on the endnote to move to that note at the end of the document; click the number again to go back to that point in the text. That beats the hell out of flipping back and forth in a paper copy.

What about the Kindle? Previously I had indicated that I didn’t much like the Kindle’s design, whereas the Sony e-reader looked more appealing. I have since visited a Sony e-reader in a Target store, and I now think it completely sucks. What I didn’t notice before is that the Sony device features ten menu buttons on the right-hand side, which screams poor design. The Target model didn’t even work right, which didn’t fill me with confidence. It seemed a lot more like a toy than a serious reader.

The Kindle, by contrast, is an elegant machine. The screen looks marvelous, and, while I have not yet spent hours reading from it, I have no doubt that will prove no problem. The Kindle’s controls are a lot more intuitive than I thought they would be. One key control is a miniature joystick, which works fabulously. (I’m used to operating a similar control on my Canon video camera.)

The Kindle, then, is great at what it does. The problem is that it does way too much for my needs, and therefore costs way too much for my budget. The Kindle is like a Hummer, when all I’m looking for is an economical and reliable little Honda. Because I don’t want to buy a Kindle, and because Amazon e-books will not yet read on my Mac, I am simply not going to buy any Amazon e-books. (Again Amazon might consider the fact that its business model is completely stupid, though at least the company is working on more readers.)

The main thing that the Kindle has that I absolutely do not want in an e-reader (for the money) is wireless technology. What I want is a cheap little USB cable through which I can load e-books from my computer library onto my reader. The ability to buy books on the road is of practically no value to me.

I didn’t realize you can browse the internet on a Kindle, which is cool, but again the coolness is not nearly worth the money. Of course I loaded up my own web page. The browser was tracking the loading progress — I kid you not — in kilobytes, with a “k.” I finally got irritated by the wait and hit the stop button, at which point (at least part of) my web page displayed, and quite nicely. But, seriously, who wants to browse the internet s-l-o-w-l-y in black and white? If I want to browse the internet on the go, I’ll buy an iPhone or Touch. I’d much rather carry two devices that do what they’re supposed to do than one device that sucks at most of its functions.

Speaking of suckage, I tried the Kindle’s audio reader software. Painful. If I were blind, I imagine I could get used to it. But it would be a real struggle. Think of the challenge of getting past Keanu’s acting to enjoy the Matrix, then multiply that by a thousand.

The Kindle has a built-in speaker and audio-processing software, so it will play mp3s and audio books. That’s cool, but I’d much rather buy a less-expensive e-reader plus a $59 iShuffle. Just sell me the reader. That’s all I want it to do.

As an e-reader, the Kindle works great. If I could just buy the e-reader part of the Kindle at a lower price, I’m pretty sure I’d do it. The dictionary is very cool. You just push the joystick until the cursor is in front of the word of interest, and the definition pops up at the bottom.

It is possible to take notes and record them with a Kindle document. Again push the joystick until the cursor is where you want it, then start “typing” your note. The keyboard, as I anticipated, is horrible. I mean, if you were a sentient ferret or something, it would probably be the perfect size. Maybe it’s okay for the “texting” generation. But I absolutely hate it. I’d much rather scribble down a few notes on a piece of paper. So, Kindle minus wireless minus the keyboard minus the high price is a device I’d love to buy.

At least the Kindle has standardized “locations” (rather than “pages”), but these don’t match the paper version. They are also listed as ranges (such as “locations 14-19″), which is strange. Will publications allow Kindle-specific citations, or will Kindle buyers need to check the page references against the paper versions? I don’t know why publishers don’t simply insert a page counter into the text itself matching the hard-copy page counts. This is trivially easy to do, though it would be a minor distraction while reading the text. Granted, some older books already have many different paginations. But there’s no reason for new books not to feature the same page references for the hardback, softcover, and e-book versions.

The Kindle will run pdf files fine. You can even upload them via USB. But to run files like Word and HTML, a user must send the file to a Kindle-specific e-mail, then Amazon “will convert the document to Kindle format.” So, in other words, to get an HTML file from my computer to my Kindle sitting right next to it, I need to send the HTML file half-way around the world to wherever Amazon keeps its computers, where Amazon will convert this already-standard-format file to the completely-non-standard Amazon format, then send the file back to my Kindle wirelessly. Did I mention that Amazon’s business model for the Kindle is completely ridiculous? I mean, God forbid that I’m able to send an HTML file via a USB cable and read it with my $259 e-reader. I mean, Amazon can install software that will (sort of) read the text out loud, but it can’t figure out how to let me read HTML files directly?

I only had one minor problem while using the Kindle: at one point, when I was trying to jump to a linked table-of-contents entry, the Kindle thought I was trying to highlight some vast portion of the document. But I soon figured out how to cancel out of that mode, and with a little jiggling got the joystick to do what I wanted it to do. (Much of this tinkering I was doing while reading Amazon’s tutorial, which is a pretty good document.)

If my income were more upper-middle-class than lower-middle-class, I’d gladly buy the Kindle, despite the risk of betting on an e-book reader that turns out to be the equivalent of Beta or HD DVD. But, given that the Kindle does way too much and therefore costs a lot, I’ll wait to buy a reader until the market has settled down a bit, the formatting issues have been resolved, and I can buy a nice low-end reader for $150 or less. At this point I will either wait to buy e-books or buy BN e-books that at least will read on my Mac.

It was a fun date, but the Kindle is not yet marriage material.

December 23 Update: I just had a thought: why doesn’t Amazon allow e-book purchasers to view the books in a web browser with password protection? Then Amazon wouldn’t even need to release additional readers. Any device with a browser would suffice. Also, I sincerely hope that Apple makes an economy-model reader, as I imagine the Tablet will be priced well outside my budget.

Tags: , , , ,


Dec 22 2009

Christmas Goose Egg from the Democrats - great poem

Category: PPCMr. Bob @ 2:41 pm

#tcot #redco #obamacare #socialism
Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the Senate
Dems schemed over health care. Who cares what was in it?
The majority planned, in guise of reform,
To pass their agenda in one perfect storm.

“We own the whole Senate!” cried they with a grin.
“Not to mention the House! It’ll get voted in.”
(Though there was no need, at least right this second;
But the vision of partisan triumphing beckoned.)

The Republican Senators of course could not win
Because their minority was simply too thin.
- But across every state there rose such a clatter
From people the Democrats thought didn’t matter.

So Dems sprang to their desks and they ran to the floor
To pass something quick, lest the mob at the door
READ THE REST AT REDSTATE

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

“Smashtroturfing” Activist Maurice “Ariel Attack” Schwenkler Pleads Guilty to Dem HQ Vandalism

mauriceschwenkler
Looks like “Ariel Attack” has been grounded.

The saga (first reported here at PPC back in August) of Maurice Schwenkler–aka transgender anarchist “Ariel Attack”–has come to a temporary close.

The accomplice, apparently, has not been identified.

The “political activist” pleads guilty (h/t Michelle Malkin):

Activist Maurice Joseph Schwenkler, 24, pleaded guilty Monday to a second-degree misdemeanor for smashing windows at the Colorado Democratic Party headquarters last summer.

He received one year of probation and was ordered to pay $5,000 in restitution for the Aug. 25 incident at the party headquarters at West Eighth Avenue and Santa Fe Drive, according to the Denver district attorney’s office.

Schwenkler and an accomplice, who was never identified, took a hammer to 11 plate-glass windows. Police caught them in the act, and Schwenkler was arrested.

Anarchist websites across the country raised money for Schwenkler’s $5,000 bail, and identified him as “a transgendered anarchist” using the name Ariel Attack. Authorities have consistently identified him as male.

The gay, lesbian and transgender protest group Denver Bash Back characterized Schwenkler as one of its “friends and comrades.”

Dem Party Chairwoman Pat Waak, whose initial attempt to smear conservatives in opposition to the Health Care reform as the ones responsible for the destruction of private property, still hasn’t retracted her statements.

The vandal has pleaded guilty Chairwoman Waak, where is my apology?

demoffice
What’s some broken glass and a smear job between political enemies?


Dec 22 2009

Obama =FDR…that’s not a good thing

Category: PPCMr. Bob @ 1:12 pm

#libertarian #redco #tcot #constitution
Very interesting video on the history of President’s ignoring the constitution when it’s convenient.

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

A Little Holiday Cheer: PJTV’s Crowder Examines Detroit Blight Up Close

Category: Liberty, PPCBen @ 12:58 pm

Three days ’till Christmas, this will give you some holiday cheer. PJTV’s Steven Crowder takes an up close & personal look at Detroit, the once proud Motor City a mere hollow shell of what it once was (H/T Red State).

The recent Clint Eastwood flick Gran Torino gave you a glimpse of what Detroit has become. But Crowder goes even deeper into the hollowed-out blight, pervasive poverty and unemployment, and the worst schools in America in his didactic tale concerning the fruit of decades of welfare state policy, Big Labor cronyism, and corrupt city government:

When conversing with someone new about my personal history, I am always quick to point out that I grew up near Detroit. It’s hard to believe — way back in the day — that some of my grandparents lived in the city. Plum jobs in the auto factories and working for suppliers once were ripe for the picking.

I remember as a child (in the 1980s) going into Detroit for baseball games. There was a lot of urban misery around then. As of my latest visit, the area around the stadiums and Fox Theatre and the Renaissance Center had made some improvements. But then again, I have never set foot in many parts of the city — which look awfully barren in the PJTV footage.

Mr. Bob calls this video Crowder’s “best work yet.” He may just be right.

Share/Bookmark

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

Detroit in Ruins - Crowder’s best work yet

Category: PPCMr. Bob @ 11:57 am

#tcot #redco #detroit #leftist #obamacare
Crowder Comedy is usually pretty funny…this is not funny. THis is serious and it is his best video to date.

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

Ralph Carr Shows Politicians Can Stand for Liberty

Category: UncategorizedAri @ 11:06 am

The following article originally was published December 21 by Grand Junction’s Free Press.

Ralph Carr shows politicians can stand for liberty

by Linn and Ari Armstrong

If you still have last-minute Christmas shopping to do, we have a suggestion. Adam Schrager, the thoughtful 9News reporter, wrote a book called The Principled Politician: Governor Ralph Carr and the Fight Against Japanese American Internment. This delightful account of important Colorado history came out in paperback earlier this month.

Carr served as governor from 1939 to 1943, an era spanning parts of two of the nation’s greatest challenges: the Great Depression and World War II. Carr responded to both these crises by defending liberty and individual rights.

As Carr entered office, Colorado government faced a $1.8 million deficit. Unlike many of today’s politicians, whose answer to deficits is to raise taxes and “fees” or increase government spending, Carr called for fiscal responsibility.

Schrager writes that Carr “announced plans to abolish many of the state bureaus and boards established by the last administration.” He also “proposed shifting the net income tax benefiting schools into the state’s general fund.” During a speech he “told the crowd that anyone who joined the civil service to have an easy job financed by taxpayers… could expect to be fired.”

We wish we could hear Carr’s common-sense wisdom reflected in today’s political debates. (All quotations are from Schrager’s book.) “The way to save money is to stop spending it.” “Spending and lending is unsound and… thrift and the full payment of debts… is simple and common honesty.”

While seconding the nomination of Wendell Willkie, who lost the presidential contest of 1940, Carr said, “If we are ever to save this country, we must first save business. Every one of you is in business — big business and little business, farmers, stockmen, laboring men, industrialists.”

Carr turned down a chance of running with Willkie (a wise move in retrospect) to continue his work in Colorado. Carr said, “What have we done to justify your returning us to office? We have taken the income of the state of Colorado. We have lived within it. We added not a dime of new taxes. We cut the levy for state purposes… and we balanced your blooming budget.”

Carr opposed Roosevelt’s expansive political controls: “The New Deal has usurped the powers of the state [and] undermined personal liberty.”

Carr added, “It is not disloyal to oppose and to question the policy of one who has not yet proved himself omnipotent and to require that he too be limited and circumscribed by those same ideals and standards governing others. We insist that the president recognize and follow the Constitution which created him.”

Carr summarized his basic political philosophy with an eloquence rare in politics: “The individual is supreme and government is established only to protect and foster his rights.” He later added, “Every time the individual submits to a central government for a solution of another problem of business or life, there is a consequent surrender of individuality, of privilege, of right.”

Carr argued that the term “liberal” had been stolen by the left. He said, “The true liberals are those who consistently follow the proposition that liberty means freedom to exercise individual rights unaffected by external restraint or compulsion… The underlying theory of the Constitution is found in the proposition that every man may use the talents which God has given him, may reach any goal toward which he sets his eyes, and may enjoy the fruits of his ambition, his study and his toil, provided only that he does not use his powers to injure his fellows.”

The fate of the nation changed on December 7, 1941, when Japanese bombers attacked the U.S. base at Pearl Harbor. Carr rose to the challenge, setting up “an emergency meeting of the Colorado Council of Defense for the next morning,” Schrager writes.

While most Coloradans responded to the crisis admirably, some turned to paranoia and racist threats. Some called Japanese Americans “vipers” and “yellow rats.” Various politicians and media personalities wanted to put them into concentration camps. The Denver Post wrote, “To hell with the Japs!” Nels Smith, governor of Wyoming, said “there would be Japs hanging from every pine tree” if sent to that state.

Carr rejected racism. He said, “We have among us many of a new generation of Japanese people born in the United States — sincere, earnest, and loyal.” He offered a “hand of friendship” to immigrants. He urged protection of the Bill of Rights and the “security, freedom, and opportunity” it offers.

In a public address, Carr granted the existence of enemy “fifth columnists” and assented to federal relocation policies. Yet he also spoke for “loyal German, Italian, and Japanese citizens who must not suffer for the activities and animosities of others.” He warned against “the danger of inflammatory statements and threats against these unwelcome guests” forcibly sent to Colorado.

Though we may not approve every detail of Carr’s career, he has richly earned his place in history as a man who defended liberty. We thank Schrager for telling his inspiring story.

Tags: , , ,


Dec 22 2009

Has Global Warming gone to the dogs?

Category: PPCThe Constitutional Reporter @ 10:38 am

Reported on AM 760 radio this morning, courtesy of host David Sirota, was this tail:

A new study suggests that a medium size dog has a greater carbon paw print than that of a 4×4 SUV vehicle on an annual basis. About two times greater in fact.

Does this mean that our owns pets are our greatest threat, or does this give credibility to those who find ‘global warming’ concerns to be a bit fishy.

Throw me a bone here.

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

Freshman Alabama Democrat Congressman switching to GOP

Category: Health Reform, SyndicatedRossputin @ 10:32 am

Alabama “Democrat” Parker Griffith will reportedly switch to the Republican Party today.  You can read the story for yourself (links below), but it’s interesting to note that Griffith is an MD.

Keep in mind that Pelosi passed health care through the House by 3 votes, of which one was a Republican who only voted yes after the Dems had enough votes to pass the bill.  Griffith was not a vote for the health care bill, so his switch doesn’t affect the count directly, but the message it sends is important because of the courage it may give other “Blue Dog” or pro-life Democrats. Pelosi has almost no margin for error as she still must pass either a Motion to Concur with the Senate Bill or else pass whatever comes out of a Conference.  Maybe our health care system isn’t dead yet…though it’s clearly still on a ventilator.

See “Rep. Parker Griffith switches to GOP“, Politico.com,12/22/09

And Michelle Malkin’s take here:
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/22/early-christmas-gift-alabama-democrat-announces-switch-to-gop/

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

Harry Reid Goes Down in History as the One Who Forced Insurance On US Citizens

Category: PPCMr. Bob @ 9:19 am

#tcot #obamacare #socialism #che
In honor of the Health Care bill passed in the middle of the night, written behind closed doors, forced on the American people in spite of the fact that nearly 70% of the people don’t want it I give you this photo. And no I don’t think the Democrats are Nazi’s. They are just acting like dictators. And I do think they are forcing on us what we do not want, like true despotic dictatorships do. Luckily we can vote them all out…them and the Republicans who have also betrayed in the last decade.

….oh yeah and no one has read it yet either but we do know one thing.

It will force people who do not have insurance to buy it, under penalty of law, by confiscatory taxation….prison or health insurance you choose.
I don’t know where I got this poster, I snagged it several months
ago when I saw it. If someone knows the author, I will gladly give credit.

Tags: ,


Dec 22 2009

UN climate chief earns millions from his position without having climate science qualifications

Category: SyndicatedRossputin @ 4:43 am

H/T Marc Morano (not surprisingly)

It’s fairly well known in America how Algore is getting rich through investments and consulting related to “green energy”, carbon trading, and other offshoots of his self-serving “global warming” alarmism hoax.  In case you haven’t heard, Gore is reported to have made more than $100 million in less than a decade, starting with a net worth of less than $2 million.  It’s a return on investment that is almost impossible without using influence to direct government money towards oneself.

But at least Gore doesn’t hold an actual position of power; what he’s earned has been as much through the gullibility of investors and politicians as through his own efforts or corruption.

The same cannot be said, apparently, of the head of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (”IPCC”), the world’s leading alarmist organization, a man named Dr Rajendra Pachauri.

In the UK’s Times newspaper, two reporters lay out a devastating case against Dr. Pachauri, a case which further implicates the IPCC as nothing but a tool for corruption and attacks on western economies.  The article notes that “Although Dr Pachauri is often presented as a scientist (he was even once described by the BBC as “the world’s top climate scientist”), as a former railway engineer with a PhD in economics he has no qualifications in climate science at all.”

And that’s the best news for Pachauri in the report, which is entitled “Questions over business deals of UN climate change guru Dr Rajendra Pachauri“.

The rest of it shows how Pachauri has taken many presumably highly-paid positions in organizations whose profits can only be generated or maintained by the IPCC’s generating or maintaining the global warming hoax and causing the UN and national governments to direct money to those organizations which claim to want to help either the environment or those poor, suffering citizens of developing nations for whom everything would be OK if only the planet weren’t warming.

It is only members of the Algore cult who wouldn’t have seen the obvious extortion at the Copenhagen Climate Summit of small countries trying to suck money, like leeches, from the west – from the US in particular.  When Hillary Clinton offered to contribute to a fund of $100 billion per year within a decade, the response from Africa was “we need $400 billion.”  Of course, Bjorn Lomborg, a scientist deeply involved with this issue and who is not really a climate change “skeptic” has repeatedly and convincingly made the point that if you want to help Africa, we should be buying mosquito nets, AIDS treatments, and investing in clean water technology. Quoting Lomborg, “for the money it would take to save one life with carbon cuts, smarter policies could save 78,000 lives.”  And again: “According to Oxfam, if rich nations diverted $50 billion to climate change, at least 4.5 million children could die and 8.6 million fewer people could have access to HIV/AIDS treatment. And what would we get for that $50 billion? Well, spending that much on Kyoto-style carbon-emissions cuts would reduce temperatures by all of one-thousandth of one degree Fahrenheit over the next hundred years.”

But who really cares about the lives of the people of Africa when the IPCC and other anti-American, anti-capitalist organizations can force or guilt governments into sending money to African governments (for siphoning off into Swiss bank accounts), into investing in projects with Pachauri and Gore coincidentally happen to profit from, and into slowing down the economic development of Third World nations whose citizens desperately need economic opportunity and the standard of living (and life expectancy) that it brings?  Naah, say Pachauri and Gore, let’s keep the poor people poor as long as we can get rich.

Tags: ,


Next Page »